Agroline » 目录 » Claas » Lexion

Claas Lexion

Claas Lexion

4.2

38 条评价

Claas Lexion 的主要参数:

数据基于 Agroline 的广告数据库整理而成

发动机功率

354 马力 - 530 马力

燃油

柴油

车桥配置

4x2 77% 4x4 23%

粮箱容积

10 立方米 - 18 立方米

工作宽度

7.5 米 - 10.5 米

卸料高度

4.3 米 - 5.5 米

容量

23 吨/小时 - 200 吨/小时

运行速度

7 千米/小时 - 30 千米/小时

速度

25 千米/小时 - 30 千米/小时

特征

技术参数的数值是根据卖家在网站上的商品信息整理而成。这些数值在同一型号的不同商品广告中可能有所差异，因此我们展示的是范围或不同的数值选项。请务必向卖家确认具体设备的实际参数。

描述

净重

14,000 千克 - 21,000 千克

毛重

16,800 千克

储罐

压缩机

16%

发动机

中间冷却器

16%

涡轮增压器

20%

汽缸数

6 77% 8 22% 其他 1%

发动机类型

直列式 72% V 形 28%

燃油

柴油

发动机功率

354 马力 - 530 马力

阀数

8 - 24

发动机容积

6,400 立方厘米 - 15,900 立方厘米

速度

25 千米/小时 - 30 千米/小时

变速箱

变速箱类型

液体静压 82% 自动 11%

车桥

轮胎规格

500/85 R24 21% 800/65 R32 13% 680/85 R32 9% 900/60 R32 5%

车桥配置

4x2 77% 4x4 23%

悬架

液压 84% 空气/空气 11% 弹簧/弹簧 5%

车桥品牌

BPW

制动类型

鼓式 66% 盘式 34%

车桥数

内饰与舒适性

车载电脑

30%

电动镜

10%

空气座椅

21%

驾驶室

立式炉

18%

其他选项

空调

34%

转向助力器

液压

沙龙材料

织物 78% 天鹅绒 10% 组合式 6%

方向盘调节

高度和前后调节 89% 高度 11%

座椅位置记忆

驾驶员座椅

座椅通风

前排座椅

多媒体

汽车收音机

24%

泊车辅助系统

后视摄像头

12%

光学仪器

辅助灯

16%

前灯

发光二极管 49% 氙气 24% 卤素 23%

附加设备

工具箱

12%

拖车挂钩

16%

Claas Lexion 评价

阅读所有评论意见

Claas Lexion 的平均分

4.2

(!)重要提示:评分依据用户的打分与反馈，可能体现主观的使用经验。

3.9

价格

4.5

可靠性

4.0

维护

4.4

操作

4.2

便利性

添加评价

4.4

联合收割机 Claas Lexion 480

2001 年

5.0 价格

4.0 可靠性

4.0 维护

5.0 操作

4.0 便利性

已自动翻译

Speaking honestly, the Claas Lexion 480 has shown its capabilities during the harvest. It came with two headers - a standard 8-meter and a 12-row one for sunflowers - which provided flexibility. The threshing mechanism combined rotary and dual drum technology, achieving efficient processing. Tires showed decent wear but were serviceable. Minor updates, like filter replacement, were necessary. Interesting machine overall.

4.0

联合收割机 Claas Lexion

2010 年

4.0 价格

4.0 可靠性

3.0 维护

4.0 操作

5.0 便利性

已自动翻译

Ran the Lexion 8700 for a few hours. I normally drive machines half this size but figured, why not see what the fuss is about. Big cab, pretty dang quiet, seat’s proper comfy and controls make sense after you get used to 'em. It’s got touchscreen for settings and that cemos auto mode - mostly it just runs itself, but you can pull back when you want. Kind of a learning curve swapping from my Deere, needed a bit to get used to the monitor and all the options. Didn’t thrash the grain too bad either, which was good to see. Can't say the wiper in the windshield is my thing. With all the features and new tech, hope nothing breaks ‘cause that might be a pain. Not perfect but definitely more pluses than minuses.

4.4

联合收割机 Claas Lexion

2008 年

4.0 价格

5.0 可靠性

4.0 维护

4.0 操作

5.0 便利性

已自动翻译

Used this model for a whole season. The fuel efficiency thanks to its advanced power system proves beneficial and cuts down costs. The newly designed rotor length indeed boosts separation efficiency, yet regular maintenance is necessary to keep it up. On bumpy terrains, the auto contour system provided stable operations, which I appreciated. However, adjusting specific settings while in motion felt a bit finicky initially.

4.4

联合收割机 Claas Lexion 480

1997 年

4.0 价格

4.0 可靠性

5.0 维护

5.0 操作

4.0 便利性

已自动翻译

Been running the Lexion 480 for a bit now, picked it up based on its condition and what I've seen. It's a '98, but it's still working fine, no major fixes needed at all - that's kinda rare for a machine this age. I like that I didn't have to throw money at repairs right out the gate, just regular checks. Engine hasn't given me any stupid surprises. The cab is actually decent, I don't end my day feeling wrecked. Rubber's in better shape than I thought - mine still at like 80% on the front, rears were about half. Only thing is, I know eventually parts might get weird to find since it's not new. But for now, starts right up and gets to work, not much to complain about on the operation side.

4.0

联合收割机 Claas Lexion

2010 年

4.0 价格

5.0 可靠性

3.0 维护

4.0 操作

4.0 便利性

已自动翻译

I’ve operated the Claas Lexion for a brief season, and its technological advancements are apparent. The hybrid threshing and separation system handles high capacities efficiently. The cab comfort is decent, although minor adjustments are needed for long hours. Maintenance is manageable if routine checks are strictly followed.

阅读所有评论意见 (38)